|
|
Chic but Chubby
By Michael FumentoScripps Howard News Service, October 16, 2003
Cases in point: The Atkins diet spent about 2,000 years on the New York Times bestseller list while The South Beach Diet reached No. 1 and is still going strong. Although the very first sentence in cardiologist Arthur Agatston's book is "The South Beach Diet is not low-carb," like the Atkins diet that's precisely what it is. Otherwise, Agatston wouldn't have invoked the same magic formula of the late Dr. Atkins, that of "hyperinsulinemia." This says that foods high on the hypoglycemic index, invariably carbohydrates, send sugar rushing into the bloodstream. The pancreas then shoots insulin like a fire hose to clear the sugar out of the blood and into the organs. But now that same insulin makes the body hunger for more sugar, creating a vicious cycle and causing obesity.
Advocates like Atkins and Agatston. And because the South Beach diet is indeed low-carb, Agatston feels compelled to claim that, "When we eat fats, we become satiated." False. The literature on this is both voluminous and clear. Fat and carbohydrates reduce hunger equally, although protein may have a slight edge. Were either the hyperinsulinemia or fat-satiety theories true, it would certainly show up in the decades of studies comparing diets of varying fat and carbohydrate content. It does not. For example, in April 2001 the Journal of the American Dietetic Association reviewed "all (such) studies identified," over 200 total. Conclusion: "Weight loss is independent of diet composition." Most recently, a review in the April 9, 2003, Journal of the American Medical Association found "insufficient evidence to conclude that lower-carbohydrate content is independently associated with greater weight loss compared with higher-carbohydrate content." In fairness, the South Beach diet is superior to Atkins in two ways. First, it encourages the consumption of healthier unsaturated fats, while saturated fats like lard and those in bacon are emblematic of Atkins. Second, while the South Beach diet allows carbohydrates, it promotes higher-fiber ones. Fiber is good for overall health. Further, by adding non-caloric bulk to food, it can aid weight control. But South Beach still can't be called a high-fiber diet since it discourages carbohydrate consumption. Ultimately neither regimen favors permanent weight-loss, which is why both authors fall back on anecdotes without having published a single study supporting their diets. Both Atkins and South Beach induce rapid weight loss in the first couple of weeks, because all low-carb diets promote quick water loss. Water is heavy, but it is not fat. If you do lose fat with South Beach it's because you're following the recipes (comprising two-thirds of the book), which amount to a low-calorie diet. But the spontaneously eating Omnivorous Americanus will not stick to recipes for very long. That's why, although the subtitle of Agatston's book modestly calls it "foolproof," a whole chapter is devoted to why people fail on it. The South Beach Diet does have one other advantage over Atkins, at least in terms of salability. Strangely, it's become more chic to talk about losing weight than to actually do so; hence a glamorous title draws readers. "South Beach" is chic; "Atkins" is not. (Agatston's hospital, incidentally, is in the drabber Miami Beach.) Alas, "chic" is not a scientifically proved method of weight loss and maintenance, while magic is the stuff of fairy tales. Only proper eating and exercise will cause permanent weight loss, as I and countless other former fatties can attest. Seven years later, when I look at myself in the mirror it still seems, well, magical. Read Michael Fumento's additional work on obesity and on the FDA. Michael Fumento is the author of numerous books. His book, BioEvolution: How Biotechnology Is Changing Our World, was published in October 2003 by Encounter Books.
|
|||||||
| |||||||