An Inoculation against Flu PanicBy Michael Fumento
Scripps Howard News Service, Oct. 9, 2003
There’s no cause for panic over the flu. But this IS proving to
be an unusual flu season for several reasons, and any disease that kills
on average 36,000 Americans
annually is serious stuff. Here’s what you should know. But “epidemic” means a higher-than-usual
rate, while cases are currently being reported at merely an average
rate. There’s also no evidence that this year’s primary strain,
A/Fujian/411/2002, is any more harmful or easier to transmit than
last year’s. But you should take extra
precautions as well. First, if you get it don’t spread it. Skip
the macho practice of showing up at the office coughing and sneezing.
Probably the only work you’re going to get done anyway is giving
free samples of germs to other workers, who will then spread them to yet
other workers and their family and friends.
With today’s technology, no. Because it takes so long to incubate viruses for the vaccine in the traditional medium of chicken eggs, strains must be identified much earlier than we would like. As for possibly not providing enough doses, last year the vaccine manufacturers had to throw out 12 million. Flu vaccines are already low-profit drugs, and the pharmaceutical companies still in the business can hardly afford such waste. But tomorrow’s technology offers real hope. Companies are working on growing the virus in mammalian cell cultures, a process that could slice months off the time required to grow the vaccine. This could both give health officials far leeway to determine the proper strains and even allow growing a whole new batch after the season has begun. As for now, that the wrong strain was included in the vaccine may still portend a harsher season than normal, although there seems little possibility of repeating such previous epidemics such as the Hong Kong flu of 1968-69. Children may be more susceptible to this strain than usual, but happily few children die from the disease in any year. Still, this should be a sobering occasion. For all the hysteria over SARS (including such assertions as “"SARS Could Eventually Kill Millions" and headlines such as "SARS Outbreak Could Overwhelm U.S. Health System"), it killed fewer than 1,000 worldwide and zero in the U.S. The writers of such doomsday pieces and the pundits who gave me hell for saying SARS was a mere sniffle compared to the flu are now wearing beards and hiding in spider holes. Again we see the case for placing priorities over panic. Read Michael Fumento's other work on diseases. Michael Fumento is the author of numerous books. |
||||
|
||||