|
|
Cynical and Cruel
Ron Reagan’s DNC Speech was Exploitation — of His Father and of Science By Michael FumentoNational Review Online, July 29, 2004
It “may be the greatest medical breakthrough in our or in any lifetime: the use of embryonic stem cells,” Ronald Reagan Jr. told enthralled listeners at the Democratic Convention. These cells could “cure a wide range of fatal and debilitating illnesses: Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, lymphoma, spinal cord injuries, and much more.”
Now why would the Democrats choose RR Jr. to deliver this speech? Heretofore, his only recognized expertise was in ballet. He never pretended his medical knowledge went further than perhaps watching General Hospital as a youth. The reason, naturally, is that RR Jr. is not only the son of a conservative Republican President, but of one whose disease we’re told could one day be cured with ES cell therapy. How utterly delicious! Liberal, pro-Kerry columnist Richard
Cohen accused RR Jr. of “grave
robbery,” not so much for exploiting his father’s name
but for doing it so cynically. After all, RR Jr. is a life-long liberal
who never voted for his dad according to Reagan’s other son, columnist
and radio show host Michael Reagan. And Miss Manners would surely not
approve of R.R Jr. converting the eulogy
for his father into a political speech with a thinly-veiled
swipe at President Bush for “wearing his faith on his sleeve
to gain political advantage.” As to RR Jr.’s convention speech, it was so opposite the truth as to resemble a photographic negative. Far from blocking federal ES cell research funding, Bush specifically authorized it so long as it used existing lines of embryonic cells. But more remarkably, RR Jr. made absolutely no reference to an alternative to ES cells that is decades more advanced and carries absolutely no moral baggage. “Adult stem cells” can be extracted from various places in the human body as well as blood in umbilical cords and placentas. They were first used to treat human illness in 1957. By the 1980s, AS cells were literally curing a variety of cancers and other diseases; ES cells have never been tested on a human. AS cells now treat about 80 different diseases; again ES cells have treated no one. AS cells obviously aren’t rejected when taken from a patient’s own body, though they may be from an unmatched donor; ES cells have surface proteins that often cause rejection. Implanted ES cells also have a nasty tendency to multiply uncontrollably, a process called “cancer.” Oops.
The only potential advantage ES cells ever had was the belief that only they could be coaxed into becoming all the different cells of the body. We don’t even know if that’s true. Conversely, three different labs have now discovered it may be true of certain AS cells. Further, perhaps we also have no need for “one size fits all.”
In recent years researchers have found that they can tease various AS
cells into far more types of mature tissue than was previously thought
possible. Moreover, they seem to find AS cells essentially wherever they
look – including blood, bone marrow, skin, brains, spinal cords,
dental pulp, muscles, blood vessels, corneas, retinas, livers, pancreases,
fat, hair follicles, placentas, umbilical cords and amniotic fluid. We
may need all sizes, but we don’t need them from one type of stem
cell.
Michael Fumento is the author of numerous books. His book, BioEvolution: How Biotechnology Is Changing Our World, was published in 2003 by Encounter Books.
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||